Books Download The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Online Free
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Paperback | Pages: 226 pages
Rating: 4.01 | 21447 Users | 1092 Reviews

Describe Books In Pursuance Of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Original Title: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
ISBN: 0226458083 (ISBN13: 9780226458083)
Edition Language: English

Ilustration During Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Thomas S. Kuhn's classic book is now available with a new index.
 
"A landmark in intellectual history which has attracted attention far beyond its own immediate field. . . . It is written with a combination of depth and clarity that make it an almost unbroken series of aphorisms. . . . Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, [this book] has been a resounding success." —Nicholas Wade, Science
 
"Perhaps the best explanation of [the] process of discovery." —William Erwin Thompson, New York Times Book Review
 
"Occasionally there emerges a book which has an influence far beyond its originally intended audience. . . . Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . . . has clearly emerged as just such a work." —Ron Johnston, Times Higher Education Supplement
 
"Among the most influential academic books in this century." —Choice
 
One of "The Hundred Most Influential Books Since the Second World War," Times Literary Supplement
 

Define Of Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Title:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Author:Thomas S. Kuhn
Book Format:Paperback
Book Edition:3rd
Pages:Pages: 226 pages
Published:1996 by University of Chicago Press (first published 1962)
Categories:Science. Philosophy. Nonfiction. History. Sociology. History Of Science. Classics

Rating Of Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Ratings: 4.01 From 21447 Users | 1092 Reviews

Discuss Of Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
10/10. Sixth ever perfect nonfiction rating: 'Structure' is not overrated at all.This is the scientific counterpart to the invaluable work of Alisdair MacIntyre in philosophy. Those works ('After Virtue', 'Whose Justice?', 'Three Rival Versions') are some of the most important for understanding the practice of philosophy and the seemingly-insurmountable aporiae in philosophy and ethics.Kuhn's work does the same for science, is extensible to many other disciplines, and is the only work I'm aware

I can understand why the author thanked his family for their consideration of the author's efforts towards this book, as it must have demanded a lot of painstaking effort not to mention time. I would have given it 3 stars for its complicated way of delivering its points; the language is highly complex that it tends at many certain points throughout, that the arguments contradict each other. Five stars, however for its complexity and taken as a whole it is actually coherent. Like the choice

Original, 2-star review:I think the common criticisms that have been popping up here - Kuhn's conclusions are very relativistic, and he's not always clear or concise in the way he conveys them - are fair. Kuhn puts forth a very interesting theory, and I think at least a few sections are very helpful when approaching the history of science. But it's certainly not a fun read, and much of the argument's density could have been fairly easily avoided. If you're a scientist, or have an interest in the



When this book came out fifty years ago it changed the terms of the debate about what scientific progress meant. Using multiple historical examples, and drawing on his own extensive research into the history of science, Thomas Kuhn developed an intellectual framework for how science develops, progresses, and changes in response to new paradigms. At the time of his writing the word paradigm was obscure and unknown to most readers, but it has since entered our common vocabulary, and this book is

I first read Kuhn's book during my first year as a Ph.D. student, and found it rather interesting. It challenges notions of scientific progress as liner by suggesting instead a process of "paradigm shift." Essentially, Kuhn argues that researchers in a branch of science accept as normal a set of "received beliefs" that guide and bound their investigations into new phenomena. Because of this set of accepted beliefs and assumptions, new ways of looking at the world are often suppressed or ignored.

Wonderful review Manny, thank you. Ill be following you now because Ive spotted some of your reviews of other books and found them quite useful! It